Illinois Appellate Court Rules Owner of Hoffman Homes, Inc.
Wrongfully Diverted Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars In Order
To Avoid Payment Of Company's Debts, and Directs Trial Court To
Enter Personal Judgment Against Owner
In a decision handed down on February 18, 2004, the Appellate
Court of Illinois for the First Judicial District reversed the
Circuit Court of Cook County and directed that court to enter
a personal judgment against the owner of Hoffman Homes, Inc..
In January of 2001, Gary Leydig obtained a judgment in favor of
his client, R&D Thiel, and against Hoffman Homes in an amount
in excess of $1.1 Million after Hoffman Homes had defaulted on
a note owing to R& D Thiel. R & D Thiel is the Chicago
area's largest carpenter contractor and housing component manufacturer.
Hoffman Homes is a high profile developer of residential real
estate in the Chicago area. Immediately following the entry of
the judgment in 2001, Mr. Leydig commenced efforts to collect
on that judgment. Those efforts were frustrated, however, by the
actions of Hoffman Homes and its president and owner, Norman Hassinger,
who set out to hide and divert Hoffman Homes' money and assets.
Though he had been served with legal process (called "citations")
requiring him to disclose all of Hoffman Homes' assets, and further
requiring him not to pay out any of Hoffman Homes' cash or property
until allowed to do so by the court, Hassinger went about stripping
his company's checking account of more than $93,000 and hiding
the existence of Hoffman Homes' ownership of a substantial development
in Libertyville, Illinois called Lancaster. As the Appellate Court
found in its decision, during the period the Libertyville development
had been hidden from R & D Thiel, Hassinger had allowed more
than $880,000 in net proceeds from the sales of homes to pass
through that development's checking account. Hassinger then allowed
more than half a million dollars to be paid to his other companies
and to other creditors - - but not to R & D Thiel in satisfaction
of its judgment as he was required by law to do. The Appellate
Court's decision states: "Hassinger did not produce the Lancaster
operating agreement providing for Hoffman Homes' 50% interest
in Lancaster until more than a year after he was served with the
citation against Hoffman Homes. This prevented R & D [Thiel]
from discovering Hoffman Homes' interest in Lancaster. In the
interim, Hassinger diverted Hoffman Homes' share of the Lancaster
profits to other entities, which do not have an interest in Lancaster,
contrary to the restraining provisions of the citations. In doing
so, Hassinger subjected himself to the penalties provided under
[the law]."
When Mr. Leydig uncovered and first brought these facts before
the Cook County trial judge hearing the case in 2001 and 2002,
the judge refused to enter any relief against Hassinger, believing
the law did not give the court appropriate jurisdiction to do
so. The failure of the trial court to act on R & D Thiel's
motions prompted the appeal. "This was one of the more frustrating
moments in my career," says Leydig. "We knew there were
hundreds of thousands of dollars out there to be had, and I knew
my client was absolutely entitled to the relief I was seeking.
We just could not convince the trial judge to act on the information
before him." The decision of the Appellate Court fully vindicates
the position that was being pressed by R & D Thiel and Leydig
all along. The Appellate Court's decision states: "The trial
court's denial of judgment against Hassinger ignores the purpose
of [the applicable law], which is to account for and preserve
the assets of the judgment debtor. Accordingly", the decision
continues, "we reverse the trial court's denial of our R
& D [Thiel's] motion for the entry of judgment against Hassinger.""It's
a terrific decision by the Appellate Court," says Leydig.
"Legitimate businessmen willingly pay their debts. This decision
makes clear that when you have the misfortune of dealing with
the other kind of businessmen - - the Norman Hassingers of the
world - - the courts will be there to support your collection
efforts. Hassinger spent the better part of the last three years
hiding and gutting the assets of Hoffman Homes, Inc.. With this
decision we can now go after Hassinger personally. It gives new
meaning to the saying: 'You can run, but you can't hide'."
Click
here to read the Appellate Court's opinion.